Comments on: Kan Extensions II: Adjunctions, Composition, Lifting
http://comonad.com/reader/2008/kan-extensions-ii/
types, (co)monads, substructural logicSat, 29 Dec 2012 15:18:06 -0800http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4hourly1By: The Comonad.Reader » Unnatural Transformations and Quantifiers
http://comonad.com/reader/2008/kan-extensions-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-106676
The Comonad.Reader » Unnatural Transformations and QuantifiersThu, 22 Nov 2012 06:43:11 +0000http://comonad.com/reader/2008/kan-extensions-ii/#comment-106676[...] , where is enriched in . Provided the above end exists, is a monad regardless of whether has an adjoint, which is the usual way one thinks of functors (in general) giving rise to [...][...] , where is enriched in . Provided the above end exists, is a monad regardless of whether has an adjoint, which is the usual way one thinks of functors (in general) giving rise to [...]
]]>By: The Comonad.Reader » A Product of an Imperfect Union
http://comonad.com/reader/2008/kan-extensions-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-62286
The Comonad.Reader » A Product of an Imperfect UnionFri, 01 Jul 2011 03:55:35 +0000http://comonad.com/reader/2008/kan-extensions-ii/#comment-62286[...] The latter few steps require identities established in my second post on Kan extensions. [...][...] The latter few steps require identities established in my second post on Kan extensions. [...]
]]>By: The Comonad.Reader » Free Monads for Less (Part 1 of 3): Codensity
http://comonad.com/reader/2008/kan-extensions-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-61224
The Comonad.Reader » Free Monads for Less (Part 1 of 3): CodensityFri, 24 Jun 2011 06:22:57 +0000http://comonad.com/reader/2008/kan-extensions-ii/#comment-61224[...] arise in a subsequent post) on this blog previously, in a series of posts on Kan Extensions. [ 1, 2, [...][...] arise in a subsequent post) on this blog previously, in a series of posts on Kan Extensions. [ 1, 2, [...]
]]>By: The Comonad.Reader » Representing Adjunctions
http://comonad.com/reader/2008/kan-extensions-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-1613
The Comonad.Reader » Representing AdjunctionsThu, 05 Jun 2008 16:49:08 +0000http://comonad.com/reader/2008/kan-extensions-ii/#comment-1613[...] I've had a few people ask me questions about Adjunctions since my recent post and a request for some more introductory material, so I figured I would take a couple of short posts to tie Adjunctions to some other concepts. [...][...] I’ve had a few people ask me questions about Adjunctions since my recent post and a request for some more introductory material, so I figured I would take a couple of short posts to tie Adjunctions to some other concepts. [...]
]]>By: The Comonad.Reader » Kan Extensions III: As Ends and Coends
http://comonad.com/reader/2008/kan-extensions-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-1476
The Comonad.Reader » Kan Extensions III: As Ends and CoendsTue, 27 May 2008 00:23:25 +0000http://comonad.com/reader/2008/kan-extensions-ii/#comment-1476[...] Grant B. asked me to post the derivation for the right and left Kan extension formula used in previous Kan Extension posts (1,2). For that we can turn to the definition of Kan extensions in terms of ends, but first we need to take a couple of steps back to find a way to represent (co)ends in Haskell. [...][...] Grant B. asked me to post the derivation for the right and left Kan extension formula used in previous Kan Extension posts (1,2). For that we can turn to the definition of Kan extensions in terms of ends, but first we need to take a couple of steps back to find a way to represent (co)ends in Haskell. [...]
]]>By: Edward Kmett
http://comonad.com/reader/2008/kan-extensions-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-1418
Edward KmettFri, 23 May 2008 05:06:41 +0000http://comonad.com/reader/2008/kan-extensions-ii/#comment-1418Update: The current version of category-extras on hackage should now build correctly on ghc 6.8.Update: The current version of category-extras on hackage should now build correctly on ghc 6.8.
]]>